Middle Ear Risk Index and results of pediatric tympanoplasty - adequate predictor?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.2053

Keywords:

Tympanoplasty, Middle Ear Risk Index, tympanic membrane, pediatrics

Abstract

Aim: To assess the usefulness of the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) in adequately predicting the success of tympanoplasty in the pediatric population.
Methods: Retrospective study of children (age under 18 years old) who underwent tympanoplasty between 2014 and 2021. Demographic data, contralateral ear status, surgical technique, type of graft, pre and postoperative audiometric data and MERI score were collected.
Results: Forty-seven children were evaluated (total of 58 ears), with an average age of 13±2.71 years. Cases with MERI lower than three had an odd ratio value of 0.35, demonstrating that this score is a protective factor for favorable postoperative results. In cases compatible with severe disease (MERI > 7) there was a chance about 17 times higher of having an unfavorable outcome in the postoperative period. Both these results were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study concludes that the MERI can be a useful tool in the preoperative evaluation in order to assess the probability of success of pediatric tympanoplasty.

References

Dash M, Deshmukh P, Gaurkar SS, Sandbhor A. A review of the middle ear risk index as a prognostic tool for outcome in middle ear surgery. Cureus. 2022 Nov 3;14(11):e31038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31038.

Shishegar M, Faramarzi M, Rashidi Ravari M. Evaluation of middle ear risk index in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2769-2774. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05539-w.

Sarkar S, Roychoudhury A, Roychaudhuri BK. Tympanoplasty in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 May;266(5):627-33. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0908-1.

Baklaci D, Guler I, Kuzucu I, Kum RO, Ozcan M. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: a review of 102 cases. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1326-1.

Gonçalves AI, Rato C, Duarte D, de Vilhena D. Type I tympanoplasty in pediatric age - The results of a tertiary hospital. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov; 150:110899. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110899.

Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for chronic tympanic membrane perforation in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):796-804. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000767.

Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.623

Torre Carlos DL, Carolina V, Perla V. Middle ear risk index (MERI) as a prognostic factor for tympanoplasty success in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;144:110695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110695.

Kartush JM, Michaelides EM, Becvarovski Z, LaRouere MJ. Over-under tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2002 May;112(5):802-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200205000-00007.

Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM. Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope. 2001 Oct;111(10):1806-11. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00026.

Zwierz A, Haber K, Sinkiewicz A, Kalińczak-Górna P, Tyra J, Mierzwiński J. The significance of selected prognostic factors in pediatric tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):323-333. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5193-z.

Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. AmericanAcademy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):186-7. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6.

Boronat-Echeverría NE, Reyes-García E, Sevilla-Delgado Y, Aguirre-Mariscal H, Mejía-Aranguré JM. Prognostic factors of successful tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jun 12;12:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-67.

Çayir S, Kayabaşi S. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;121:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.007.

Ozbek C, Ciftçi O, Tuna EE, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Aug;29(5):679-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad57.

Kumar N, Madkikar NN, Kishve S, Chilke D, Shinde KJ. Using middle ear risk index and ET function as parameters for predicting the outcome of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Mar;64(1):13-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-010-0115-4.

Published

2023-11-06

How to Cite

Carção, A., Gomes, P. M., Cunha-Cabral, D., Duarte, D., & Neves, M. (2023). Middle Ear Risk Index and results of pediatric tympanoplasty - adequate predictor?. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 61(3), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.2053

Issue

Section

Original Article